Identity
Is the material actually the named substance? A purity percentage does not answer identity by itself.
A certificate of analysis is a report about stated tests on a stated sample or lot. It is not FDA approval, and by itself it does not prove that the vial in someone’s hand is correctly identified, potent, sterile, endotoxin-free, stable, or the same material that was tested.
Is the material actually the named substance? A purity percentage does not answer identity by itself.
How much active ingredient was measured? This is a different question from purity.
What proportion of the tested material produced the expected analytical signal, and what other peaks or contaminants were detected?
Did a validated test find viable microorganisms in the tested sample? Chemical purity is not a sterility test.
Did the tested sample meet a stated endotoxin limit? A sterile result does not answer this separate question.
Was the injectable checked for visible and subvisible particles?
Does evidence support the stated storage conditions and expiration or beyond-use date? A single snapshot does not establish shelf life.
Is there a trustworthy chain connecting the report, tested sample, labeled lot, and finished vial? A genuine report can still be irrelevant to a different sample.
It will not authenticate a seller, recommend a laboratory, certify a vial, or turn incomplete paperwork into a purchase recommendation. FDA’s records show why identity, strength, purity, sterility, endotoxins, and particulates are separate quality questions.