THE PEPTIDE INTERNET · WITH RECEIPTS✳ PRIMARY RECORDS OVER PRESS RELEASES✳ UNKNOWN IS A REAL ANSWER✳ NO PRODUCTS · NO PROTOCOLS · NO VENDORS✳ EDUCATIONAL JOURNALISM · NOT MEDICAL ADVICE✳ THE PEPTIDE INTERNET · WITH RECEIPTS✳
The Peptide Current Corrections A PepCurrent Publication
We sell nothing. Every claim cited.
Corrections

Corrections Policy & Record

When we make a mistake, we say so clearly. This page is a permanent public record of every correction we have issued. See also our editorial policy for how we try to avoid needing this page in the first place.

Current Corrections

No active corrections. No errors have been identified in any published issue of The Peptide Current to date. This record will be updated whenever a correction is issued.

Our Corrections Process

We take factual accuracy seriously. When an error is identified — by a reader, a source, or a member of our editorial team — we follow this five-step process:

  1. 01
    A reader, source, or editor identifies a potential error and submits it via corrections@pepcurrent.com or by replying to the original issue email.
  2. 02
    An editor reviews the submission within two business days, consulting primary sources and, where appropriate, the original reporter or a subject-matter expert.
  3. 03
    If the error is confirmed, a correction is published prominently in the next issue of The Peptide Current and appended to the online archive version of the affected piece.
  4. 04
    The correction is logged in this public record with the date, the issue in which it appeared, the nature of the error, and the correction.
  5. 05
    The reader or source who identified the error is notified of the outcome. If their submission was not acted upon, we explain why.

What We Correct

We distinguish between factual errors, which we correct, and matters of editorial judgment, which we do not revise after publication.

What counts as a correction
  • Incorrect facts — wrong numbers, dates, names, or identifications
  • Misquotation — words attributed to a source that they did not say
  • Misidentified sources — wrong affiliation, title, or credential
  • A headline that materially misrepresents the piece it heads
  • Erroneous characterization of a study's findings or methods
What does not trigger a correction
  • Matters of editorial judgment — topic selection, framing, or emphasis
  • Differing interpretations of ambiguous or contested evidence
  • Reader disagreement with our conclusions
  • Stylistic choices — word choice, structure, or tone
  • Information that became available after publication
To report a potential error, write to corrections@pepcurrent.com. Please include the issue number, a description of the error, and the primary source you believe contradicts our reporting.