Don’t trust the summary. Audit it.
Every important PepCurrent answer should lead back to the source, the evidence limit, the review date, and the change that would make us reconsider it.
Four ways to inspect the work
Claim by claim, including what got cut.
Open the public ledger behind Issue 01, then continue to the independently reviewed Issue 02 and Issue 03 records.
Open Issue 01 → Evidence auditSee how a skeptical conclusion was built.
Issue 02 logs the BPC-157 evidence audit, the human-record boundary, and the claims that had to be narrowed.
Open Issue 02 → Structured registryClaim → source → status → change.
The method and downloadable registry connect every Claim Check to its source, product context, review date, and version history.
Read the method → CorrectionsErrors do not disappear into a silent edit.
Material corrections name what was wrong, what replaced it, when it changed, and which source supports the correction.
Read the corrections policy →How to audit a PepCurrent answer
- Open the exact claim.
Check that the answer is tied to the same outcome, population, route, product, and date you care about.
- Open the strongest source.
Confirm whether it is an FDA record, randomized trial, uncontrolled report, animal study, cell study, or something else.
- Read the catch.
Look for what was not studied, what remains unknown, and whether an ingredient name is being confused with a specific product.
- Check the version history.
See when the page was reviewed, what changed, and what evidence event would change the answer again.
Machine-readable, not auto-published: The 28-record claim/source registry is public. One system may prepare an update; a separate system must verify its factual claims against primary sources, and publication remains a manual action.
Get the change, with the receipt.
Join the early list for material updates and the primary sources behind them. No vendor promotions and no forced weekly filler.
Join the early list →